Results That Speak for Themselves

---

The Challenge

Our client, a major manufacturing conglomerate, got hit with a massive lawsuit claiming they'd violated exclusive supply agreements with a distribution partner. The opposing side was demanding nearly $300 million, alleging our client had secretly developed alternative supplier relationships in violation of their contract. Thing is, the contract language was ambiguous at best, and the supplier had actually been underperforming for years.

Our Approach

We dove deep into the contract history and discovered the original negotiators had intentionally left certain terms flexible to account for market changes. Then we documented every instance where the supplier had failed to meet delivery obligations - turns out there were dozens of incidents they'd conveniently forgotten about. We also brought in industry experts who testified that the so-called "exclusive" arrangements were actually standard practice that nobody interprets as truly exclusive in this sector.

The Outcome

The arbitration panel not only dismissed the supplier's claims but actually awarded our client $187 million for breach of their own obligations and damage to our client's reputation. The suppliers had been spreading false information to other potential partners, which we proved through email discovery. It took 18 months of intense work, but seeing our client vindicated and compensated made it worth every late night.

---

The Challenge

A tech startup we represent was getting crushed by a much larger competitor claiming patent infringement. The big player essentially wanted licensing fees that would've put our client out of business - classic predatory litigation. They were betting the startup couldn't afford a prolonged fight and would settle early.

Our Approach

We knew we had to go on offense. First, we filed for inter partes review with the Patent Office to challenge the validity of their patents - turns out their "innovative" technology had been described in academic papers years before they filed. Meanwhile, we built a rock-solid non-infringement defense showing our client's architecture was fundamentally different. We also uncovered evidence that the plaintiff had been shopping this lawsuit around to multiple companies, trying to create a patent troll revenue stream.

The Outcome

The Patent Office invalidated key claims in their patents, and the court dismissed the remaining claims after our summary judgment motion. The plaintiff didn't even appeal - they knew they were done. Our client's now thriving, and ironically, the publicity from defending themselves successfully actually attracted investor attention they wouldn't have gotten otherwise.